Tag Archives: clay buchholz

The Game Hidden Between Buchholz’s Pitches

 Clay Buchholz #11of the Boston Red Sox reacts after getting taken out in the third inning after giving up six runs against the Baltimore Orioles at Fenway Park April 21, 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts.

When two teams play baseball, two games are being played simultaneously: the pitching, hitting, and fielding game that fans see, and the hidden (don’t call it “cheating”) game where players try to get gain a competitive edge on the opposition.

Fans usually hear about the hidden game after the fact – like when Joe Mauer stole signs in a game against Detroit in 2009. Mauer was on second base and had a clear view of every sign the catcher dropped down. When Mauer figured out whether a fastball or breaking ball was coming, he would either touch his helmet or do nothing before the pitch to relay that information to the batter. Occasionally, play-by-play announcers will catch onto the hidden game and report it during a game. The most recent example of that is Don and Jerry ranting about the pine tar on Michael Pineda‘s hand during a recent Red Sox v. Yankees game.

But whether or not we, as fans, are lucky enough to hear about it, the hidden game is always being played inside of a baseball game.

So when Clay Buchholz gave up seven hits and six runs in the third inning of yesterday’s Red Sox game with the Orioles, was the hidden game being played? Absolutely. And I wish I could tell you the details of that game.

One complaint I’ve had about NESN over the years is their lack of focus on the game itself. Frequently during games, a player will get a hit and NESN will spend time panning the camera on the player while he’s standing on base, then switch to the next pitch being thrown while the pitcher is in mid-windup. Then there are other diversions: like a fan throwing pizza at another fan, or Heidi Watney choking on a corn dog (which became metaphor nobody needs to think too deeply about to grasp)… There’s a million little diversions to point out, and I don’t mean to be a killjoy, but they all distract from both baseball games that are being played.

In the case of Buchholz’s disastrous third inning, I watched it over again a couple of times. Only once did NESN allow me to see some signs that David Ross dropped to Buchholz to decide on which pitch to throw. At barely any time did NESN have a camera on the Orioles’ baserunners, so I couldn’t tell if they made any telltale body motions that tipped off Buchholz’s next pitch to the batter.

But, despite NESN’s distractions that don’t allow us to keep our attention on the game; and despite the implication that the other team must be cheating, an explanation for the Orioles hammering Buchholz may be more mundane: they may have picked up on where Ross set himself up to receive Buchholz’s pitches, and they were able to relay that information to the batter.

I don’t consider this cheating because, quite frankly, if Buchholz didn’t take forever and a day to make a pitch when runners are on base, baserunners probably wouldn’t have time to relay information about where Ross has set up to the batter.

There’s a few examples where Buchholz’s extended delay between pitches gave Orioles’ baserunners enough time to relay information about the upcoming pitch to the batter. I’m not saying the Orioles baserunners did relay this information since, as I mentioned, I couldn’t tell what the baserunners were doing because of the way NESN broadcasts their games. I’m just saying that Orioles’ baserunners had time to relay information about the next pitch, and this is mostly due to Buchholz’s long delay between pitches when runners are on base.

Example 1: The first batter of the inning, Steve Lombardozzi, hits a single. Next batter is David Lough. Ross immediately sets up outside, then Buchholz steps off the rubber. Delay. Buchholz prepares to pitch again, but throws a pick off attempt to first base. Another delay. After the pick off attempt, Ross sets up outside again – so they never changed what pitch was next up – and Lough gets a first pitch single. It took Buchholz around a minute to get through that charade and deliver a pitch to the plate, and anyone paying attention to where Ross setup would have known what was coming. Lough certainly did.

Example 2: After Lough, Nick Markakis came to the plate. This is the only time NESN allowed the viewer to see what signs Ross dropped to Buchholz between one of the pitches, the 2-2 pitch. Ross’s sequence ended with two fingers, Buchholz appeared to throw a two seam fastball, and Markakis smacked it for a single. It’s worth noting that in this at bat, and throughout the inning, Ross sometimes tried to deliberately slow down the time it took him to set up to receive the pitch – waiting until Buchholz was in his windup. So, in this instance, the Orioles may have stolen a sign. Also worth noting that Buchholz’s pitch was a meatball down the center of the plate, so maybe the Orioles didn’t even need to steal a sign.

Example 3: Nelson Cruz bats after Nick Markakis. Ross sets up outside way before Buchholz starts to deliver his pitch, and Cruz swings like he knows an outside fastball is coming – but Buchholz misses his target by a foot, it becomes an inside fastball that Cruz fouls off. Ross again sets up early on the 0-1 pitch, and it’s the outside fastball Buchholz tried pitching the first time. Cruz smacks it for a single.

Afterwards, Buchholz induced a fielder’s choice ground ball from Adam Jones (albeit with a run scored), but Steve Clevenger gets a hit with a ball deep to right field. Jonathan Schoop, the last batter Buchholz faces, has a seven pitch at bat that ends when he hits a curveball off the Green Monster. Buchholz’s first pitch to Schoop was a curveball off the plate, so Schoop already knew what Buchholz’s curveball looked like. Unfortunately, Buchholz’s second curveball was over the plate. Schoop’s hit was probably totally legit.

As I mentioned previously: Do I know if Orioles’ baserunners were relaying information about Buchholz’s pitches to batters? Nope. Absolutely not. Due to the way NESN broadcasts these games, I don’t have a clue regarding what the Orioles’ baserunners were doing. But it’s quite feasible that, because of Buchholz’s intentional laboring between pitches, he gave the Orioles time to execute the hidden game against him.

All it took was Lombardozzi’s single at the top of the inning to give the Orioles a baserunner with a chance to relay Ross’s placement to receive Buchholz’s pitches to batters, and the Orioles certainly executed after that. Buchholz gave up seven hits – including 5 hits in a row – and six runs.

After the game, John Farrell said that nothing is physically wrong with Buchholz. Comments were made about Buchholz needing to increase his arm strength, which would explain why his fastball barely tops 90 mph. His pitches also lack movement, and 88-90 mph straight fastballs can easily become batting practice pitches. So maybe Buchholz just sucked. Or maybe he’s hiding an injury and he should go on the DL.

But, if you’re able to catch a replay of the game, watch that third inning again. Don’t you think that something hidden, that we didn’t see the first time we watched the game, could be going on?

photo credit: getty images

Tarred and Feathered

Michael Pineda Pine tar on hand

There’s much ado regarding the brown substance Michael Pineda had on his pitching hand during the Red Sox v. Yankees game last night. Pineda claims it was dirt because his palms sweat more than a [insert your own joke about teenage shenanigans here]. Pineda maintains this claim despite his sweaty palms problem miraculous clearing up after the 4th inning when his hands were clean. Everyone else thinks the gunk on Pineda’s hands was pine tar: you, me, the Boston media, the national media, your mom, my mom, Pineda’s mom, your dog’s mom, etc.

Does it matter? Yes, but not in the way that you’re thinking. Buchholz, who’s no stranger to accusations of cheating, has the best take on the Pineda controversy when he was asked if it was an issue:

“No, especially on cold windy nights, it’s tough to get a grip on the baseball,” Buchholz said. “I had that instance last year in Toronto, people said I had stuff all over my body you can use — rosin, water, the whole sunscreen stuff, whatever. I’d rather have a grip on the baseball and semi-know where it’s going [than] have no grip and get somebody hurt.”

A pitcher not having a firm grip on the ball is the crux of the matter, and perhaps this is why were not reading about complaints from Red Sox hitters regarding Pineda. (Besides Jonny Gomes, who had some negative comments. But Gomes is like Mikey and he hates everything.) Hitters place their lives in the pitcher’s hands every time they’re at the plate, and they seem content knowing that pitchers are doing everything possible to make sure an errant fastball isn’t flying towards their face because they couldn’t grip the baseball. In some cases, pitchers will use pine tar – which, technically, is cheating. But you don’t see the hitters complaining.

As for whether Pineda using pine tar improved his performance against the Red Sox lineup, some will say yes and point out that Pineda no-hit the Red Sox through four innings. But this is the same Red Sox lineup who, a day before, got one-hit through five innings by the Rangers’ Robbie Ross. Ross isn’t a star, and he wouldn’t even be in the Rangers’ starting rotation if that team hadn’t suffered some early injuries to its starters. Ross also walked five Red Sox hitters, and the one hit was a weak squibber that didn’t make it past the infield grass.

The Red Sox hit into seemingly countless double plays during their series with the Rangers, and they struck out 12 times against Yankees’ pitchers last night. Whether Robbie Ross is pitching clean or Michael Pineda is pitching dirty, the Red Sox are not hitting, period. They’re falling behind in counts and swinging at breaking balls, which results in either a swing and miss or a ground out. Instead of being able to foul off these pitches, work a count to 3-2 and force the pitcher to throw a fastball, the Red Sox are swinging into outs. That’s the issue, not pine tar.

 

A few Red Sox trouble spots to start the season

It’s easy to be negative in Boston, the town where we still reflexively react to the frustration of waiting 86 years to win a World Series despite winning in the past decade. So let me preface this post by saying that the Apocalypse is not nigh: it’s only the first week of the baseball season, Detroit still has a perfect record, Arizona is an unspeakable 1-7, the Devil Rays are in first place, and these are all examples of things that won’t last.

And the Red Sox have shown flashes of brilliance, on and off the field. Henry, Lucchino and Werner surprising David Ortiz with a World Series MVP ring was a stroke of genius because the currency Ortiz recognizes is respect. In baseball, respect is most often measured in contract dollars, so Ortiz occasionally complains that he’s not getting paid at the same level of his peers. By giving him the World Series MVP ring, Red Sox ownership usurped currency as a measure of respect and gave Ortiz the gift of ultimate respect. That ring is worth more than a $100 million contract to Ortiz, and it probably cost less than $500,000, so the gift was a shrewd business move.

So, with that said, let me revert to my normal negative Bostonian self and dwell on the bad news.

Clay Buchholz – After years of waiting for Buchholz to reach his potential and put together a season as an Cy Young contender with 200+ innings pitched, the Red Sox have resigned themselves to assuming that Buchholz will go on the DL at least once a season and made him the fifth starter. It’s a shame that Buchholz has only been able to put it together for 10-15 starts a season because, in those games, he looks everything like the Cy Young-esque pitcher we thought he would become. Getting those types of starts from the fifth starter would, at least, demonstrate the strength of the Red Sox starting rotation.

Where Buchholz is concerned, though, you always have to fear when (not if, but when) he’ll go on the DL. Under that pretense, his start against Milwaukee on April 5 was worrying because his fastball just wasn’t fast. Most of his fastballs were 88-89 mph (a couple reached 90 mph), which left little difference between his fastball and 85-86 mph change-up. And both pitches had little movement on them; they were left up in the zone and Brewers hitters hammered them.

Buchholz couldn’t throw his curveball effectively either, which usually doesn’t concern me because a curveball is tough for any pitcher to throw in cold weather (aces like Clayton Kershaw and Adam Wainwright both had trouble snapping off curveballs last October), but since Buchholz’s other pitches weren’t working, now it could be a cause for concern; if only because he doesn’t have a third pitch to rely on when his fastball isn’t humming.

But Buchholz’s loss of velocity is my biggest concern, because it could mean he’s holding back and that’s indicative of an injury. The Red Sox have enough depth to cover for an injured starter – Brandon Workman has looked great so far – but I’ll take Buchholz at 100% over Workman; or Jon Lester, or John Lackey, or mostly any other pitcher, quite honestly. Without a healthy Buchholz, the Red Sox once strong rotation now has just another fifth starter. Even if that starter is Workman or one of the prospects in Pawtucket, it will still led to more losses than when Buchholz is pitching.

Will Middlebrooks – A day after hitting a solo home run and looking like he was getting hot at the plate, Middlebrooks was scratched from the lineup on April 5 because of a leg cramp; and wasn’t even available to pinch hit in what became an extra innings loss where the Red Sox really could have used his bat. He’s missing from the April 6 lineup as well, and reports say he’s getting an MRI on his right calf.  Middlebrooks was placed on the 15 day DL about point-five seconds after I wrote that part I crossed out. Sigh.

Unlike depth at other positions, Red Sox don’t have much depth at third base until Garin Cecchini is MLB-ready. The team lucked out last year with Jose Iglesias, after Middlebrooks worked himself into a well deserved demotion to Pawtucket.

Middlebrooks hit .194 in April 2013, and just .138 in June 2013 before being sent down – and he was making a throwing error to first base every 5-6 games, it seemed. Jose Iglesias served has surprise depth the Red Sox didn’t realize that they had, and the fact that Wil Myers won the Rookie of the Year award over Iglesias was a crime. Iglesias at least should have been awarded some sort of combo Gold Glove for SS/3B or something. Not to digress, but why doesn’t a utility infielder Gold Glove exist?

Regardless, Iglesias is on the DL now, so even if the Red Sox kept him, they would still have to depend on Middlebrooks because the other options are Brock Holt and Brandon Synder. But can the Red Sox depend on Middlebrooks? He has yet to play a full MLB season, and this year is Will’s third chance to get it together and play for a season without being injured or optioned to Pawtucket. Beyond durability, the other issue with Middlebrooks is his lack of plate discipline. In the few games he’s played in 2014, he’s still swinging at those outside pitches that can produce ground outs.

If Middlebrooks puts in another season where he’s not durable or improving at the plate, the Red Sox will need to make a decision on whether to give him another shot or cut bait. In 2013, Middlebrooks forced the team to make a decision mid-season and they had Jose Iglesias to fall back on. But in 2014, if Middlebrooks again forces the Red Sox to make a decision about him, then he might be part of a trade to bring a professional third baseman to Boston. The Red Sox have given Middlebrooks more than enough chances to win the job at third base, and it should be do-or-die time for him.

A.J. Pierzynski – As a writer, it’s in my best interests if the Red Sox cut Pierzynski because I won’t need to keep Googling that mess of a surname to make sure I’m spelling it correctly…

AJP (there, that’s better) has turned in a solid career as a catcher, and he had a better season than Jarrod Saltalamachia last year. Keep in mind that 2013 was likely Salty’s career year: he had a .372 average for balls in play, but still struck out at the same rate. So Salty had a lot of good luck at the plate last year, which made up for him being horrible behind the plate: he allowed 89 stolen bases, and had the most total baserunners try to steal off of him.

AJP isn’t the best defensive catcher, but he’s still a threat to gun down baserunners and a threat at the plate, so the Red Sox choosing AJP over Salty was a no-brainer.

Unfortunately, AJP looks like he put on weight over the offseason, and he’s looked bad at the plate. He hasn’t looked great behind the plate either, but he hasn’t been horrible. Hopefully he’s just off to a slow start and this isn’t his age finally catching up to him. AJP’s slow start would be easier to swallow if he appeared to be hustling, though. Players are judged by Boston fans on how much hustle they show, and if AJP doesn’t start hitting soon, he’s going to have a really rocky relationship with the Red Sox fan base.

Xander Bogaerts – Bogaerts looks like a mature veteran at the plate, and I would be surprised if he didn’t rake 200 hits this season. In fact, I’d place some money on Bogaerts eventually passing Pete Rose and becoming baseball’s all time hits leader. But his fielding is a work in process. Besides the balls that were within his range but he couldn’t field, there were balls out of his range that Stephen Drew or Jose Iglesias would have reached. Boston fans were spoiled with superior shortstop fielding in 2013, and other teams have it worse. (How’s Segura working out for Milwaukee? And who’s that 40 year geezer playing in the Bronx?) But, hopefully Bogaerts will improve in the field. If he doesn’t, then perhaps Bogaerts can be the third baseman of the future if Middlebrooks doesn’t work out.

Like I mentioned from the start, none of this negativity means it’s the end of the world. But it’s just a few things to keep in mind and worry about, if you’re the worrying type of person. If you’re cheering for the Red Sox, then I’ll just assume you’re the worrying type.